tweeting and/or regular blogging, a matter of discipline?

July 30th, 2010

I’ve felt that I’ve neglected this blog a little. While I’ve recently spent some time overseas on holiday/travelling and haven’t posted here for a while, I want to be more consistent in writing posts reflecting on my professional experiences. While I’m active in Twitter, the posts I make there aren’t as in-depth, or able to contain the resources I might include in a blog post.

So, I’m going to try and post every week on a Friday morning, and try to capture what’s happened during the past week. My intention is that this will become a ‘story’ of my journey as an educator and how I (we) might use of technologies to support learning and teaching. I also hope that I’ll provide information and reflections that are of interest to other educators/learners. I don’t think this is a huge commitment, but I understand that I’ll have to be disciplined to collect my thoughts (and resources) and set aside the time to write them down regularly.

it about how you use the (web 2.0) tool, not the tool itself

July 30th, 2010

This week I was fortunate to be able to attend a seminar presentation by Associate Professor Matthew Allen, called “Using Web 2.0 in Your Teaching”. Matthew is a Teaching Fellow of the Australian Learning and Teaching Council and is the leader of the ‘Learning in Networks of Knowledge‘ (LINK) project.

Matthew emphasised that Web 2.0 is about connection and stressed that when thinking about Web 2.0 we need to take into consideration the 4Cs.

    • Components: what feeds into the knowledge work system
    • Cognition and Collaboration: thinking and working together forms the processing system
    • Communication: the results of processing become public and the basis of audience reception and conversation

      Matthew presented us with his top 10 Web 2.0 tools and gave us some great ways to use them for learning & teaching. It was useful to be reminded that it’s not about the tool, it’s about what you can do with the tool. Here’s his list – I was surprised that I was only familiar with only two of them. They may not all be mainstream, but they could add value to the learning activities/ experiences you develop.

      1. xtimeline – xtimeline enables users to create timelines of events, in a constrained but flexible format, with collaboration features, and public communication options
      2. listphile – “a powerful tool for organizing and collaborating around structured information. Call it a database tool, if you will (but please don’t scare anyone away)” [**I couldn’t access this link today, but will check again later]
      3. slinkset – slinkset creates social news sites, private, shared or public like digg, with extensive yet simple to use design features
      4. posterous – posterous is a powerful yet simple blogging engine with a particular emphasis on ease of posting: do it by email
      5. mind42 – Mind mapping is … about entering ideas, arranging them … and refining and deepening ideas with colors, links and other attributes”
      6. quizlet – quizlet is a flashcard production and use system, with inbuilt group and collaboration features and innovative ways of testing knowledge
      7. reviewbasics – reviewbasics is a web-based service allowing users to work together to review documents, websites images with an emphasis on annotation
      8. springnote – “wiki, word processing, and file organization [and] … sharing, having collaborators… to organize all the information you need at your fingertips”
      9. knol.google – knol is Google’s answer to Wikipedia: editable, classified user-generated content based on the idea of a ‘knol’ (a unit of knowledge)
      10. wiggio – comprehensive group collaboration tool: calendars, to do, sharing, online meeting and polling … people work as teams, not a group of individuals

      You can also access the presentations on each of the tools on Slideshare, and a video recording of Matthew’s presentation capturing his discussion on each of the tools. You can follow Matthew on Twitter and read more of his work on his website (look for ‘writing’ tab).

      you can’t take enough care, even when changing little things…

      April 19th, 2010

      I’ve recently noted again how some people react to adversely to (even very small) change. We had a minor change at work that caused users to authenticate twice to get to the LMS. Not a good idea.

      After some feedback, the change was adjusted quickly so that only one login was required, but more than enough people sent round emails giving their two cents worth with regard to how inconsiderate people were in making the change without consulting, and that they wanted things reverted to how they were previously.

      I found that explanations for the change weren’t readily accepted and that some people seemed to make comments just to make a comment, or get on the band wagon. There was no engagement with explanations, suggested work arounds, or an acknowledgement that the change may actually be useful – just some reactive, ill considered spaying that impressed no one. Who knows, maybe it’s a symptom of the busy, stressed workplace and taking any opportunity to have a go at someone (usually in leadership or a decision maker) else. What a waste of energy.

      Anyway, the take-home for me? Have a think about the level of change you are implementing, and whether any communication is required at all – and if so, keep it brief and highlight the positive effects of the change. Then sit back and keep your head down till the noise goes away & the dust settles.

      what’s all the fuss about, to iBuy or not to iBuy and iPad?

      April 15th, 2010

      The iPad has arrived to much attention, hype, & otherwise. Those of us outside the US will have to wait a little longer for the device, but I’m good with that (& maybe some minor bugs ironed out before we get our hands on one).

      Apple have done it again and managed to raise a good amount of media coverage with the introduction of this new device. I’ve been reading so much about the iPad, I thought I’d add my own reflections to the mix. The reviews have been mixed as to whether the device is useful, how it might be used, the market position of Apple controlling apps & content, and if it meets with market/industry expectations. I suppose much of this is useful in helping inform someone thinking about purchasing the device, and arguing whether it might be useful in education or business use. What I find a little distracting in all the wordplay is that people seem to either love it or hate it. If you don’t want one or aren’t interested, that’s OK – you might even design your own alternative device. If you want one, it doesn’t help to fawn at the feet of the manufacturer – we need to keep them on their toes and provide feedback on shortcomings.

      I see the iPad as a device designed to do a number of things, but generally see it to be a platform for consuming content. It’s a lot about the functionality and interface (see James Clay’s post) and it doesn’t pretend to be something it isn’t. I think that it will prove to be well designed and provide a great experience when using it. It will be much better to use that the iPod Touch and provide extra functionality. From an education perspective, I recognise that the iPad could provide some leverage in providing a platform for study, game-play, accessing content, and limited interaction.

      I think there remains the question the ability of the device to support collaboration & content creation.In the end time will tell, and who knows – there might even ‘be an app for that’. But whatever they’ll cost, and whenever they become available, I’m sure I’ll be there to iBuy an iPad.

      what kind of story are you telling when presenting at conferences?

      December 15th, 2009

      Some of my thinking since the ascilite 09 conference that I recently attended in Auckland, has centred around the style of presentations I listened to. I was able to learn a lot about a range of topics (as reflected on in previous posts), but I feel that something was lacking during the presentation sessions. I’ve come away from the three days of short talks wondering why I didn’t feel more engaged with some of the talks I attended.

      I believe the way I’m feeling has something to do with the ‘stories’ that people told. Too often we were presented with the outline of the paper as it was written for the conference, and people often read out their dot points from their slides. I would rather hear the story of the journey, the experience, how people felt while working their project, reflections from participants, about the new understanding they developed, and what changed about their thinking. An interesting story will always lead me to the paper and further investigation.

      Narrative is core to our culture and we only need to look at the popularity of books & films to see how much we like a good yarn. While we in developed Western cultures have lost a lot of the oral tradition, it is still a common means of passing on knowledge and understanding. Maybe we would do well to focus a little more on developing stories through which to ‘deliver’ content, ideas, and findings in our educational institutions.

      I believe a ‘presentation story’ is (should be) more than just about having a beginning, middle, conflict, resolution, and end, it’s about making it personal and sharing how your learning has effected, changed and evolved you. Sharing stories, or making a narrative out of what you want to say, helps provide authenticity and will connect with the audience, it grounds the presentation in lived experience. The story needs to be told within a context or setting, and the characters provide us access to the drama as we learn about it through their eyes. We get to understand the human element of the research, the impact to the participants and how learning has been improved, lives enhanced, innovation adopted, etc.

      Is your story good enough to hold the attention of an audience? An audience of your peers at a conference, or an audience of students in a lecture or classroom. Are you able to engage your listeners in a (your) personal journey and make connections with others by inviting them to participate in your story? Do you have any good examples of a narrative presentation?

      What do you think? Should we be focusing more on narrative in our teaching as well?

      I’ve set myself the challenge of making the presentations I do next year, more like stories/narratives and will look forward to hearing what people think about them…

      (these reflections don’t take into account the potential of a good slide deck to support a story, or whether there might be a Twitter or live blog, back channel in action while you are presenting – might cover those topics in a future post)

      ascilite09 conference reflections #4 – Day Three

      December 10th, 2009

      Wednesday already & the final day of ascilite09. Another gorgeous morning in Auckland (the weather has been perfect), and some people slow to turn up for proceedings after the dinner/dance last night.

      We began with short plenary session where Matthew Riddle reported on his Blackboard research grant where he asked student to record their ‘day experience’ using mobile technology. Some interesting initial findings that students spend a lot of time at home, and when on campus would like better access to the internet and to powerpoints for laptops in meeting places – particularly after hours. (watch this space)

      I then attended a session on eportfolios that explored the benefits & value of the use of a space where students can be reflective learners, collect artifacts, demonstrate acquisition of graduate attributes and professional competencies, complete assessable tasks and developing showcases or representations of their learning to particular contexts. We were challenged to think about the questions that could be asked of staff & students before going ahead with an eportfolio implementation plan. I understand that there needs to be some clear articulation of purpose and context when talking about eportfolios so that people understand how they are to used in a particular way in a particular place/space.

      I went to the symposium, ‘Thinking about a new LMS: Comparing different institutional models and approaches’ where we heard representatives from four institutions discuss their evaluation and implementation of a new LMS – all of them went for Moodle. All very interesting as the university where I work has just about completed the evaluation process and about to decide on a new LMS platform. What was useful, was hearing about the planning and implementation phase of these projects and the lessons learned. Lots of great do’s & don’ts and tips & tricks for getting the best outcome for an implementation. There were no papers or presentations available for this session but each institution took a different approach to evaluation and implementation – one complete institution-wide with all courses converted, and another staged implementation with staff having to rebuild their units. Main take-home points for me: communication is key, get buy-in from academic staff, have some departmental champions, have a committed executive sponsor, ensure everyone knows where they are heading, and communicate (in as many ways as possible). You might be interested in Mark Smithers’ blog post Public LMS Evaluations, where he has compiled a list of publicly available LMS reviews.

      After another delicious lunch, James Clay gave the final keynote and asked us all to think about what the ‘mobile’ means in mobile learning. He outlined the advantages & disadvantages of (mobile) technology and wondered how well education is coping with the changes in work, culture, & society. It was an engaging presentation that asked lots of questions and challenged us to think about how we respond to this change and what we might do to prepare our students for the future. It was great to see James have the Twitter backchannel displayed during his talk. He used keynotetweet to have tweets from his Keynote slides posted to the #ascilite09 hashtag so that those not present, could follow his slide points in Twitter. Nice!

      You can access the archive of tweets with the #ascilite09 hashtag at Twapper Keeper, and you can also access the programme and papers of the conference online.

      The handover to ascilite 2010 was made and the host for next year is University of technology Sydney. Hopefully see you there!